Quick Answers
What are qualifying leaseholders protected from?
Being charged through the service charge for relevant building safety costs — the costs of remediating relevant defects such as cladding, fire safety defects, and structural building safety risks arising from construction or refurbishment within the past 30 years. The protection applies regardless of what the lease says and cannot be overridden by a freeholder or managing agent.
Does the protection apply automatically?
Yes — the protections are imposed by statute and apply by operation of law. Leaseholders do not need to claim them in normal circumstances. But where a service charge demand includes protected costs, the leaseholder must actively challenge it — paying without objection may be treated as acceptance. Complete and return a leaseholder certificate if the landlord requests one.
What if the building is below 11 metres?
The Schedule 8 leaseholder protections only apply to buildings above 11 metres or five storeys. Leaseholders in lower buildings are not covered by these specific provisions. Other routes may still be available — developer liability claims under the new 30-year cause of action, or HHSRS enforcement by the local authority — but the direct service charge cap does not apply.
The protection structure: the Building Safety Act 2022 created a waterfall of liability for relevant building safety defects. Developers who created the defect bear primary liability. Where the developer cannot be pursued, the freeholder/landlord bears secondary liability subject to means-tested caps. Qualifying leaseholders sit at the bottom and are protected — the costs that cannot be recovered from developers or within the landlord caps cannot be passed to qualifying leaseholders through the service charge.
Why leaseholders are still being charged: some freeholders and managing agents are unaware of the protections or choose to ignore them. Some have argued that specific cost categories (waking watch, interim measures, professional fees) fall outside the protected categories. Some have issued service charge demands to leaseholders who may not satisfy the qualifying criteria and relied on those leaseholders not challenging. The Tribunal is the forum for resolving these disputes and leaseholders should use it.
Key Takeaways
The protections override the lease — freeholders cannot contract out of them
Whatever the lease says about service charges, the Building Safety Act 2022's leaseholder protection provisions override it. A lease that appears to allow building safety costs to be charged through the service charge cannot be used to circumvent the statutory protections. Any term of a lease that purports to require a qualifying leaseholder to pay relevant building safety costs in excess of the caps is void. Freeholders and managing agents who continue to charge based on lease terms without reference to the Act's protections are issuing unlawful demands.
The 30-year developer liability window is the first port of call
The leaseholder protections on service charge costs are part of a broader framework that places primary responsibility on developers. Before considering what leaseholders can or cannot be charged, the question is always whether the developer who created the defect can be pursued. Buildings constructed or substantially refurbished within the past 30 years by an identifiable developer (or their corporate successors) should have that developer route explored before any other. The leaseholder protections become relevant where that route is exhausted or unavailable.
The "relevant defect" definition determines what is and is not protected
The protection applies specifically to "relevant building safety costs" — costs incurred in relation to "relevant defects." A relevant defect is a defect in or relating to the design, construction, or refurbishment of a relevant building (above 11 metres or five storeys) within 30 years of the Remediation Order or Remediation Contribution Order, that causes a building safety risk. Cladding is the paradigm example. Not all building safety costs are relevant building safety costs — routine fire safety maintenance, for example, is not covered by the protection and can still be charged through the service charge.
Non-qualifying leaseholders can still be charged — but only within limits
Leaseholders who do not satisfy the qualifying criteria — who owned more than three residential properties, who were not occupying the flat as their main home and owned more than three properties, or whose building is below 11 metres — do not have the same absolute protection. However, their contribution to relevant building safety costs may still be limited by the landlord contribution caps (which depend on the landlord's net worth) and by the developer liability framework. Non-qualifying status is not the same as having no protection at all.
The leaseholder certificate is the mechanism for establishing qualifying status
The Act introduced a leaseholder certificate — a formal document that leaseholders complete and serve on the landlord to establish their qualifying status. Completing the certificate confirms ownership on the qualifying date, the number of residential properties owned, and whether the flat was used as a main home. Where a landlord serves a demand for relevant building safety costs, they should first request a leaseholder certificate to establish the leaseholder's status. Leaseholders who have not received a certificate request may still be protected — but completing and serving the certificate proactively avoids any dispute about their status.
Paying a demand under protest preserves challenge rights; silent payment may not
Where a service charge demand includes relevant building safety costs and the leaseholder is a qualifying leaseholder, the protection applies. But if the leaseholder pays the demand without objection, this may be treated as acceptance of the liability — particularly if the landlord then argues that the leaseholder agreed to pay. Where payment is required to avoid lease breach consequences, pay under protest with a covering letter noting that the payment is made without prejudice to a Tribunal challenge to the lawfulness of including relevant building safety costs in the demand. Then make the Tribunal application.
Who Is a Qualifying Leaseholder
The qualifying leaseholder definition in Schedule 8 of the Building Safety Act 2022 is based on the leaseholder's position on 14 February 2022 — the date the Building Safety Bill was introduced to Parliament.
You held the long leasehold interest in the flat on 14 February 2022 — or you subsequently purchased the flat from a qualifying leaseholder in a transaction at arm's length after that date.
On 14 February 2022, you occupied the flat as your only or principal home — OR you owned no more than three residential properties in the UK in total (including the flat) on that date.
The building is above 11 metres or five storeys in height. This is an objective measurement — flats in buildings below this threshold are not within the scope of the leaseholder protection provisions.
You do not qualify if you owned the flat as a buy-to-let investment and also owned more than three residential properties in the UK on 14 February 2022 — even if you have since sold some of them.
You do not qualify if you were the developer of the building, a subsidiary or associated company of the developer, or a landlord with a significant interest in the building at the qualifying date.
The qualifying date is fixed at 14 February 2022. Whether you are now a qualifying leaseholder is determined by your position on that date — it cannot be changed retroactively. A leaseholder who purchased after that date is a qualifying leaseholder only if they purchased from a qualifying leaseholder at arm's length.
What Costs Are and Are Not Covered by the Protections
Protected — cannot be charged to qualifying leaseholders
- Removal and replacement of unsafe external cladding systems (ACM, non-ACM)
- Remediation of unsafe cavity barriers and fire stopping defects
- Repair or replacement of structural elements that create a building safety risk due to defective construction
- Remediation of fire doors and other passive fire safety elements where the defect arises from original construction or a developer refurbishment
- Professional fees, surveys, and consultancy costs directly associated with remediating relevant defects
- Legal costs of pursuing developers for contribution to remediation costs
Not automatically protected — can still be charged through the service charge
- Routine fire safety maintenance (fire alarm testing, extinguisher servicing, fire risk assessment fees)
- Lift maintenance and ordinary communal area repairs
- Building insurance and routine management fees
- Fire door replacement programmes where the doors are not a relevant defect (i.e. original specification was correct but doors have worn out through normal use)
- Waking watch and interim common alarm system costs — the legal position on these is contested and developing, and specialist advice should be taken
- EWS1 assessment fees where the assessment was routine rather than for a specific remediation programme
Whether waking watch and interim common alarm system costs fall within the leaseholder protection provisions is one of the most actively disputed questions in building safety law. Some argue these are costs caused directly by the relevant defect and should be protected. Others argue they are operational costs rather than remediation costs and fall outside the protected categories. The Tribunal has considered the issue in multiple cases without producing a definitive universal ruling. Qualifying leaseholders being charged for waking watch through the service charge should take specialist legal advice and consider a Tribunal application. Do not simply accept that these costs must be paid.
The Landlord Contribution Caps
Where the developer cannot be pursued and the relevant building safety costs exceed the landlord's capped contribution, those costs cannot be passed to qualifying leaseholders. The caps are means-tested against the landlord's net worth.
| Landlord net worth | What the Landlord Can Be Required to Contribute |
|---|---|
| Under £2 million | The landlord cannot be required to contribute to relevant building safety costs at all where their net worth is below the £2 million threshold. Costs above this cannot be passed to qualifying leaseholders. Where no developer route is available and the landlord has insufficient net worth, government funding routes (the Cladding Safety Scheme) become the primary mechanism. |
| £2 million to £10 million | The landlord's contribution is capped and scaled — they can be required to contribute, but only up to a level proportionate to their net worth. The detailed cap calculations are set out in Schedule 8 and the associated secondary legislation. Where the capped contribution does not cover the full remediation cost, the excess cannot be passed to qualifying leaseholders. |
| Over £10 million | Higher net worth landlords face higher but still capped liability. The Act does not impose unlimited liability even on wealthy freeholders — the cap formula scales with net worth up to the statutory ceiling. Where the full cost exceeds the cap, the deficit is again protected from being passed to qualifying leaseholders. |
| Associated landlords | Where a landlord structure involves multiple associated entities, the net worth assessment may aggregate the assets of the group rather than considering the specific landlord entity in isolation. This prevents landlords from structuring their affairs to appear asset-poor while holding significant value through associated entities. The associated landlord provisions can be complex and may require legal advice to apply correctly. |
The Leaseholder Certificate
The leaseholder certificate is the formal mechanism by which a leaseholder establishes their qualifying status under the Act. It was introduced to create a clear administrative process for confirming who is and is not a qualifying leaseholder before service charge demands are issued.
The process works as follows:
- The landlord serves a landlord's certificate when they wish to pass relevant building safety costs through the service charge. The landlord's certificate must specify the nature of the relevant defects and the costs being claimed, and invite the leaseholder to complete a leaseholder certificate confirming their qualifying status.
- The leaseholder completes and returns a leaseholder certificate confirming their ownership position on 14 February 2022, their property portfolio at that date, whether they occupied the flat as their main home, and any other information relevant to their qualifying status.
- Where the leaseholder is confirmed as a qualifying leaseholder, the landlord cannot pass the relevant building safety costs to them through the service charge.
- Where the leaseholder does not complete a certificate, the landlord may be entitled to treat them as non-qualifying and include the costs in the service charge. Leaseholders who are qualifying should complete the certificate promptly when requested.
Qualifying leaseholders who have not yet been asked to complete a leaseholder certificate should consider serving one proactively. The certificate form is available from government sources. Serving it proactively establishes your qualifying status formally and puts the landlord on notice that relevant building safety costs cannot be charged to you. Keep a copy of the completed certificate and evidence of service. This creates a clear record that cannot later be disputed.
Challenging Unlawful Service Charge Demands
Where a service charge demand includes relevant building safety costs and the leaseholder is a qualifying leaseholder, the demand is unlawful to the extent it includes those costs. The correct route to challenge it is through the First-tier Tribunal.
Steps to take:
- Do not pay the demand without objection. If payment is required to avoid lease consequences, pay under express written protest noting that the payment is made without prejudice to a challenge at the Tribunal.
- Write to the landlord or managing agent citing the leaseholder protection provisions of the Building Safety Act 2022, stating that you are a qualifying leaseholder, and stating that the demand includes costs that cannot lawfully be charged to you. Request that the demand be reissued excluding the relevant building safety costs.
- Apply to the First-tier Tribunal for a determination that the service charges including the relevant costs are not payable by a qualifying leaseholder. The Tribunal has jurisdiction to make this determination and to order repayment of any relevant costs already paid.
- Take specialist legal advice where the amounts involved are large or where the application involves disputed questions about whether specific costs fall within the relevant defect category. Building safety solicitors with experience of Tribunal applications in this area are the appropriate specialists.
For the cladding remediation funding hierarchy and which party bears primary responsibility for remediation costs, see Cladding Remediation Funding: Who Pays and How Leaseholders Can Access It. For the EWS1 position and its interaction with mortgage lending, see EWS1 in 2026. For waking watch costs and the ICAS transition, see Waking Watch: When Is It Required and What Does It Cost?
Buildings Below 11 Metres: What Protection Exists
The Building Safety Act's Schedule 8 leaseholder protections on service charge costs do not apply to buildings below 11 metres or five storeys. This leaves leaseholders in a significant portion of the residential building stock without the direct service charge protection that higher-rise leaseholders benefit from.
What remains available for sub-11-metre buildings:
- Developer liability claims under the new cause of action. The Building Safety Act's new 30-year cause of action against developers applies to all residential buildings of any height where the defect arises from construction or refurbishment within the limitation period. A developer who built a defective two-storey block of flats can still face a liability claim under the Act.
- HHSRS enforcement by the local authority. Where a building safety defect constitutes a Category 1 hazard under the HHSRS, the local authority has enforcement powers to require remediation. These powers are not height-dependent and apply to buildings of any size.
- The ordinary service charge reasonableness challenge. Even without the Schedule 8 protection, leaseholders in lower buildings can challenge building safety cost demands through the normal service charge reasonableness route at the First-tier Tribunal, arguing that costs which should be borne by the developer are not reasonably incurred from the service charge fund.
Frequently Asked Questions
Costs associated with remediating relevant defects — building safety risks arising from defective construction or refurbishment within the past 30 years. This covers cladding removal and replacement, fire safety defects, structural building safety risks, and related professional fees and legal costs. The protection does not cover routine fire safety maintenance, ordinary building repairs, or building insurance. Waking watch and interim measure costs are contested and specialist advice is required.
A leaseholder who held the long leasehold on 14 February 2022 (or purchased from a qualifying leaseholder at arm's length since) and either occupied the flat as their main home or owned no more than three residential UK properties in total on that date. The building must be above 11 metres or five storeys. Large portfolio investors and landlord-connected parties do not qualify. The qualifying date is fixed and cannot be changed retroactively.
A means-tested cap that limits the amount a landlord (freeholder) can be required to contribute to relevant building safety costs where the developer cannot be pursued. Landlords with net worth below £2 million face no required contribution. Higher net worth landlords face scaled but still capped contributions. Costs above the cap cannot be passed to qualifying leaseholders. Where neither developer nor landlord can fund remediation within their caps, government schemes (the Cladding Safety Scheme) fill the gap for eligible buildings.
The protections apply by statute — no active claim is needed in normal circumstances. But leaseholders must challenge service charge demands that unlawfully include protected costs rather than paying silently. Where the landlord requests a leaseholder certificate, complete and return it promptly to establish qualifying status formally. Where a demand is received including protected costs, write under protest before paying and apply to the Tribunal. Silent payment may be treated as acceptance of the liability.
Not under the Schedule 8 leaseholder protection provisions — those only apply to buildings above 11 metres or five storeys. Leaseholders in lower buildings are not covered by the direct service charge protection. However, they may still have remedies through the 30-year developer liability cause of action (which applies to all heights), HHSRS enforcement by the local authority, and the ordinary service charge reasonableness challenge at the Tribunal for costs that should be borne by the developer.
Receiving service charge demands that may include protected building safety costs?
Neon's building safety compliance audit covers the leaseholder protection position for blocks in East London and Essex — confirming qualifying leaseholder status, identifying what costs should and should not be in the service charge, and providing a clear basis for challenging unlawful demands at the Tribunal. Our £88 audit is the starting point.
Book a compliance audit — £88 →